The Veteran's effective date for dependency compensation for his spouse is denied as proof of dependents was not provided within one year of the qualifying rating decision.
The deciding factor: Proof of dependency was not provided within one year of being notified of the qualifying rating action (40% disability rating).
- Claimed conditions
- Post-phlebitic syndrome, Thrombophlebitis
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 40%
- Decision date
- October 7, 2024
- Citation
- A24063870
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 622 · Granted: 17% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A24063870.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Veteran's right lower extremity varicose veins, post-phlebitic syndrome, deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism are currently rated as 10 percent disabling. The Board found that the evidence does not support a higher rating due to lack of persistent edema or stasis pigmentation.
- Granted
The Veteran's right leg thrombophlebitis is rated at 60 percent from August 30, 2019. Service connection for left leg thrombophlebitis secondary to the right leg has been granted. The claim of TDIU remains pending.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's increased rating claim for thrombophlebitis of the left leg was denied, and her TDIU claim was remanded.
- Denied
The Veteran's claim for a higher rating for his left lower extremity varicose veins and post-phlebitic syndrome was denied as there is no evidence of persistent edema, stasis pigmentation or eczema to warrant an increased rating.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.