The Board has remanded the cases for further examination and medical opinions regarding whether the Veteran's herpes simplex type II and left shoulder pain and limited range of motion had their onset in service or are related to service.
The deciding factor: The evidence is insufficient to determine if the conditions had their onset in service, necessitating a VA examination to provide such determinations.
- Claimed conditions
- herpes simplex type II, left shoulder pain and limited range of motion
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- October 8, 2024
- Citation
- A24064168
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 2,017 · Granted: 36% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A24064168.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Board granted a 60 percent disability rating for herpes simplex type II because the Veteran requires near-constant use of systemic medication to control symptoms.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for service connection, increased evaluations, and eligibility to Dependents' Educational Assistance are being remanded due to the need to obtain additional medical records.
- Granted
The Board has granted service connection for a skin disorder, including skin rashes and herpes simplex type II, finding that the Veteran's statements and hearing testimony supported his claims of recurrent skin rash since service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to a lack of adequate opinion regarding whether any skin disorder is etiologically related to service. The AOJ must obtain outstanding VA treatment records and an adequate opinion from the examiner.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.