Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's hypertension claim is denied as the evidence does not support a compensable evaluation.,The Veteran's psoriasis claim is denied as there is no basis for an increased rating under any applicable diagnostic code.,The Veteran's thoracolumbar spine and bilateral hip disabilities are remanded to obtain proper VA examinations.,The Veteran's left hip bursitis and right hip bursitis claims are also remanded to obtain proper VA examinations.

The deciding factor: The evidence does not meet the criteria for a compensable evaluation of hypertension, as there is no diastolic blood pressure elevation or systolic pressure predominantly 160 or more requiring continuous medication.,There is no basis for an increased rating under any applicable diagnostic code for psoriasis, given that the Veteran's skin condition is treated with topical medications and does not meet the criteria for a higher rating based on systemic therapy or disfigurement of the head, face, or neck.,The VA examinations did not account for flare-ups in assessing the severity of the thoracolumbar spine and bilateral hip disabilities. Therefore, remand is needed to obtain proper evaluations that do so.,Flare-ups were not adequately addressed in the VA examinations for left hip bursitis and right hip bursitis. Remand is needed to ensure proper assessments.

Claimed conditions
hypertension, psoriasis, degenerative arthritis of the thoracolumbar spine, left hip bursitis based on limitation of flexion, right hip bursitis based on limitation of flexion
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
October 15, 2024
Citation
A24065472

Veterans Law Judge

M.E. Larkin

Decisions by this judge: 2,084 · Granted: 20% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A24065472.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.