The Veteran's claims for a compensable disability rating for left fallopian tube hydrosalpinx and right fallopian tube constriction status post laparotomy with partial right salpingectomy and right tubal re-anastomosis, and service connection for maxillary edentulous alveolar ridge with mandibular edentulous alveolar ridge (claimed as TMJ/TMD jaw and gum pain) as secondary to loss of bone in mandible due to edentulous atrophy and failing full denture were denied. The Veteran's conditions did not require continuous treatment, and there was no evidence that the maxillary edentulous alveolar ridge with mandibular edentulous alveolar ridge (claimed as TMJ/TMD jaw and gum pain) was caused by her service-connected condition.
The deciding factor: The Veteran's maxillary edentulous alveolar ridge with mandibular edentulous alveolar ridge (claimed as TMJ/TMD jaw and gum pain) was not shown to be related to a service-connected condition, and the evidence did not demonstrate that it required continuous treatment.
- Claimed conditions
- left fallopian tube hydrosalpinx and right fallopian tube constriction status post laparotomy with partial right salpingectomy and right tubal re-anastomosis, maxillary edentulous alveolar ridge with mandibular edentulous alveolar ridge (claimed as TMJ/TMD jaw and gum pain)
- How they argued it
- Secondary to another service-connected condition
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- October 15, 2024
- Citation
- A24065644
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,874 · Granted: 33% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A24065644.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Board has determined that the Veteran's headaches are at least as likely as not caused by his service-connected traumatic brain injury, and thus grants service connection for this condition.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for hypertension and peripheral neuropathy of the bilateral upper and lower extremities due to insufficient medical opinions regarding their etiology.
- Granted
The Veteran's major depressive disorder is found to be caused by his service-connected low back and radiculopathy disabilities, which prevent him from doing enjoyable activities and daily living tasks.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for obstructive sleep apnea, peripheral neuropathy of the bilateral upper extremities, and peripheral neuropathy of the bilateral lower extremities, finding that there was no evidence linking these conditions to his active service or any related exposure.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.