The Board has determined that the VA did not fulfill its duty to assist in obtaining a retrospective medical opinion regarding the Veteran's loss of use of bilateral lower extremities and his need for regular aid and attendance. The cases are therefore remanded.
The deciding factor: VA failed to obtain an adequate retrospective opinion addressing the earliest date from which no effective function remained other than that which would be equally well-served by amputation with a suitable prosthetic appliance, as required in prior remand directives.
- Claimed conditions
- Loss of use of bilateral lower extremities
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- October 15, 2024
- Citation
- A24065762
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,863 · Granted: 26% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation A24065762.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Board has granted an effective date of August 3, 2021 for the award of special monthly compensation (SMC) at the (r)(1) rate based on the Veteran's need for aid and attendance due to his disabilities.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to errors in notification and medical evaluation, as well as a need for an updated medical opinion regarding personal care services needs.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's adult child, K.M.G., is awarded an effective date of September 27, 2012, for additional dependency compensation due to the establishment of a rating in the percentage specified by law for that purpose.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to a need for additional development regarding whether the Veteran's impairment of bilateral lower extremities constitutes 'loss of use' as defined by VA regulations. The remand requires obtaining a medical opinion on the level of functional impairment and comparing it to what would be achieved with amputation stumps at the site of election below the knees with suitable prosthetic appliances.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.