Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Granted

Service connection for excessive body hair of the face, neck, chest, stomach, and feet has been granted.,An effective date earlier than February 19, 2020, for service-connected cracked tooth has been granted.,The Veteran's claim for an effective date earlier than January 15, 2020, for PTSD is denied.,The Veteran's claim for an effective date earlier than January 15, 2020, for TBI is denied.,Service connection for asthma including as due to undiagnosed illness remains pending and requires further development.

The deciding factor: The Board found the evidence in equipoise regarding whether the Veteran's current excessive body hair arose during her service. After resolving all doubt in favor of the Veteran, service connection was granted.,The earliest effective date that may be assigned is January 24, 2020, as the Veteran submitted an intent to file a claim on this date or earlier.,There is no medical evidence of a factually ascertainable date on which the Veteran's service-connected PTSD worsened. The Board found that an earlier effective date based on 38 C.F.R. § 3.400(o)(2) is not warranted.,The earliest effective date that may be assigned is January 15, 2020, as the Veteran submitted a claim for TDIU on this date or later.,Service connection for asthma including as due to undiagnosed illness remains pending and requires further development.

Claimed conditions
Excessive body hair of the face, neck, chest, stomach, and feet, Cracked tooth, Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), Traumatic brain injury (TBI)
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
October 16, 2024
Citation
A24066483

Veterans Law Judge

G. William Riggs

Decisions by this judge: 575 · Granted: 29% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A24066483.

What this means for you

A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.