Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's claim for a rating in excess of 10 percent for GERD is remanded due to inadequate examination.,The Veteran's claim for a rating in excess of 20 percent for lower back disability is remanded due to the inconsistency between the September 2022 and June 2014 VA examinations regarding IVDS status.,The Veteran's claims for ratings in excess of 10 percent for right and left lower extremity radiculopathy are both remanded as no peripheral nerves examination has been conducted yet.,The Veteran's claim for a TDIU prior to March 14, 2017 on an extraschedular basis is remanded due to the lack of evidence showing her inability to secure and follow substantially gainful employment before that date.

The deciding factor: The September 2022 VA examination for GERD did not address the ameliorative effects of medication use, which may affect functional limitations.,There is inconsistency between the June 2014 and September 2022 VA examinations regarding the Veteran's intervertebral disc syndrome (IVDS) status.,No peripheral nerves examination has been conducted to assess the severity of the Veteran's lower extremity radiculopathy.,The Veteran continuously pursued her claims for lower back disability, bilateral lower extremity radiculopathy, and TDIU prior to March 14, 2017.

Claimed conditions
major depressive disorder, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), lower back disability, right lower extremity radiculopathy, left lower extremity radiculopathy
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
October 17, 2024
Citation
A24066818

Veterans Law Judge

Leetra J. Harris

Decisions by this judge: 878 · Granted: 36% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A24066818.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.