The Board remands the claim for an initial rating in excess of 10 percent for SVT arrhythmia and persistent atrial fibrillation due to a duty to assist error, requiring a new VA examination.
The deciding factor: The RO did not afford the Veteran a wholly adequate VA examination prior to the rating decision on appeal, necessitating another examination to determine the current severity of the service-connected heart conditions.
- Claimed conditions
- SVT arrhythmia, persistent atrial fibrillation
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- October 22, 2024
- Citation
- A24067853
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 2,199 · Granted: 25% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A24067853.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for heart disease, finding that the evidence did not support a link between the Veteran's conditions and his military service or any service-connected disabilities.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient evidence regarding whether the Veteran's heart conditions are related to service or his service-connected diabetes mellitus. Specifically, they need to determine if hypertension is a disability of service origin and its relationship to the Veteran's heart diseases.
- Denied
The Veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for the grant of service connection for persistent atrial fibrillation was denied as the earliest possible effective date is August 22, 2018.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.