The Board denied service connection for foot spasms and athlete's foot, but remanded the claim for hammertoe.
The deciding factor: The evidence did not support a finding of current disability or nexus to service for foot spasms and athlete's foot. The Veteran was also required to waive his right to select a different Board review option.
- Claimed conditions
- foot spasms, athlete's foot, hammertoe
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- November 1, 2024
- Citation
- A24071237
What this means for you
A partial grant means some issues were granted while others were denied or remanded — common in multi-issue claims. Look at which issues went which way, and how each was argued.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claim for service connection for athlete's foot to correct pre-decisional duty to assist errors.
- Dismissed
The veteran's appeal requests for service connection for various conditions were denied as the appeals were not timely filed.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claim for service connection for athlete's foot due to an inadequate medical opinion.
- Dismissed
The appeal was dismissed due to the lack of a current disability for athlete's foot, left foot pain, right ankle pain, and vision disorder. The claims for tinnitus and erectile dysfunction were also dismissed as they were fully granted in a subsequent rating decision.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.