Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)PACT Act

The Veteran's rhinitis is not rated higher than the current 10 percent rating.,A 40 percent rating for left sciatic nerve disability is granted. The Veteran's right ankle and right knee conditions are remanded to determine if they are secondary to service-connected disabilities, and a sleep apnea claim is also remanded.,The Veteran's right ankle condition may be related to his service-connected left ankle condition, but further examination is needed to confirm this. His right knee condition is also remanded for similar reasons.,His right knee condition may be related to his service-connected left knee condition, and a sleep apnea claim is also remanded.,The Veteran's sleep apnea may be related to his service-connected rhinitis, but further examination is needed to confirm this.

The deciding factor: There is no evidence of greater than 50 percent obstruction of the nasal passage on both sides or complete obstruction on one side for a compensable rating.,The Veteran's left sciatic nerve radiculopathy was found to have moderately severe incomplete paralysis, warranting a 40 percent rating.,Right ankle and right knee conditions are remanded as there is insufficient evidence regarding their relationship to service-connected disabilities.,Right knee condition is also remanded for similar reasons.,Sleep apnea claim is remanded due to lack of an opinion on its etiology.

Claimed conditions
rhinitis, left ankle condition, right ankle condition, right knee condition, sleep apnea
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
November 4, 2024
Citation
A24071710

Veterans Law Judge

Ann K. Minami

Decisions by this judge: 868 · Granted: 42% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A24071710.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.