Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
GrantedPACT Act

The Veteran's service connection claims for prostate cancer, erectile dysfunction (ED), multiple sclerosis, and trigeminal neuralgia have been granted. The claim for myalgia remains pending.,Service connection has been established for prostate cancer on a presumptive basis due to herbicide exposure during active service aboard the U.S.S. Ticonderoga. Service connection is also granted for erectile dysfunction as secondary to residuals of prostate cancer, and multiple sclerosis with trigeminal neuralgia have been found directly related to in-service exposure at Camp Lejeune.

The deciding factor: The Veteran's service records confirm his active duty aboard the U.S.S. Ticonderoga where he was exposed to herbicide agents during operations in Vietnam, which supports a finding of presumptive service connection for prostate cancer.,Service treatment records and VA examination findings support a secondary service connection for erectile dysfunction as it is proximately due to residuals of prostate cancer.,The Veteran's exposure at Camp Lejeune to contaminants like trichloroethylene (TCE) and benzene has been linked by medical evidence to his multiple sclerosis, which supports direct service connection.,Service treatment records indicate the onset of trigeminal neuralgia concurrent with a diagnosis of multiple sclerosis, supporting secondary service connection for this condition.,The claim for myalgia remains pending as there is insufficient evidence to establish its relationship to active service.

Claimed conditions
prostate cancer, erectile dysfunction (ED), multiple sclerosis, trigeminal neuralgia, myalgia
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
November 12, 2024
Citation
A24073492

Veterans Law Judge

Kristin Haddock

Decisions by this judge: 2,050 · Granted: 32% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A24073492.

What this means for you

A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.