The Veteran's appeal for an increased rating in excess of 10 percent for papilledema has been dismissed due to the withdrawal of his appeal by his counsel.
The deciding factor: The Veteran withdrew his appeal through his attorney, indicating he no longer wished to pursue the claim.
- Claimed conditions
- papilledema
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- November 12, 2024
- Citation
- A24073728
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,135 · Granted: 33% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A24073728.
What this means for you
A dismissal means the Board did not decide the issue on its merits — usually because it was withdrawn or had become moot. It says more about procedure than about whether a claim like this can win.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for a left eye disorder, including amblyopia and other conditions, as there was no evidence of aggravation beyond their natural progression during the Veteran's periods of active duty.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to inadequate medical opinions regarding the etiology of the Veteran's bilateral glaucoma, vitreous floaters, and papilledema. The Veteran asserts that these conditions are related to her service-connected left knee patellofemoral syndrome.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for bilateral eye optic drusen and right ankle strain due to insufficient medical opinions regarding the Veteran's diagnoses and service connection. Additional imaging of the right ankle is also required.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that the January 2015 VA examination report is inadequate and requires a supplemental medical opinion to address the relationship between the Veteran's left eye disabilities and his military service.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.