The Board has decided to remand the case due to inadequate VA examination and a need for further medical opinion regarding the nature and etiology of the Veteran's abdominal disorder.
The deciding factor: The VA examiner failed to consider the Veteran's reports of scar symptomology since service when rendering her opinion, which is an inadequate rationale.
- Claimed conditions
- abdominal disorder
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- November 13, 2024
- Citation
- A24074256
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 931 · Granted: 42% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A24074256.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for earlier effective dates, compensable ratings, and service connection for various conditions due to insufficient evidence of characteristic prostrating attacks for tension headaches, considerable impairment of health for GERD, a current disability for an abdominal disorder or gynecological disorder, and functional impairment for a right wrist disorder.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims of service connection for diabetes mellitus type II, liver disorder, abdominal disorder, and right foot disorder due to a lack of sufficient opinion regarding the etiology of these conditions. The Veteran's service-connected depression, lumbar spine disability, and right knee disability are alleged to have contributed to obesity, which in turn caused his diagnosed conditions.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the cases of service connection for left wrist condition, abdominal disorder, and right wrist strain due to insufficient evidence in some areas. The Veteran's claims are not currently supported by a current diagnosis or sufficient medical opinion.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's petition to reopen her claim for service connection of an abdominal disorder is granted. The appeal is remanded for further development regarding the Veteran's bilateral wrist disorder and abdominal disorder claims.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.