Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's PTSD is rated at 70 percent, and the Board finds it does not warrant a higher rating.,The Veteran's prostate cancer residuals are rated at 40 percent, and the Board finds it does not warrant a higher rating.,The Veteran's erectile dysfunction does not meet the criteria for a compensable disability rating.,The claims of service connection for a low back disability and an increased disability rating for right knee strain have been remanded by the Board.,No specific effective date provided as this is an initial decision.

The deciding factor: The Veteran's PTSD symptoms do not meet the criteria for total occupational and social impairment, warranting a higher 100 percent rating. The current 70 percent rating adequately reflects his disability picture.,The Veteran's prostate cancer residuals are primarily manifested by urinary frequency with daytime voiding intervals less than one hour and nighttime awakening to void five or more times. No other criteria for a higher rating is met.,The Veteran does not have penile deformity or any other abnormality that would warrant a compensable disability rating for erectile dysfunction.,Further evaluation of the low back disability and right knee strain is needed as these claims are remanded.,No specific reasoning provided, only findings based on evidence.

Claimed conditions
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), Prostate Cancer Residuals, Erectile Dysfunction
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
November 14, 2024
Citation
A24074513

Veterans Law Judge

KRISTI L. GUNN

Decisions by this judge: 2,062 · Granted: 34% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A24074513.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.