Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Board has determined that the decision denying eligibility for PCAFC is not clear and does not provide adequate reasons or bases. The Veteran's service-connected conditions, including PTSD, major depressive disorder with generalized anxiety disorder, sleep apnea, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), tension headache, left shoulder labral tear, wrist tendinitis, fibromyalgia, lumbosacral strain, knee pain, plantar fasciitis, tinnitus, TMJ capsulitis, dry eye syndrome, allergic rhinitis, scars, and psoriasis are considered. The Board has ordered remand to clarify the reason for denial and provide proper notice.

The deciding factor: The decision is unclear regarding whether the Veteran's inability to perform ADLs or a need for supervision, protection, or instruction was the basis for denying PCAFC eligibility.

Claimed conditions
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), major depressive disorder with generalized anxiety disorder, sleep apnea, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), tension headache, left shoulder labral tear, superior labral anterior-posterior lesion (SLAP) non-dominant hand, left and right wrist tendinitis, fibromyalgia with somatic symptom disorder with predominant pain, depressive anxious distress, lumbosacral strain with degenerative arthritis of the lumbar spine, right and left knee patellofemoral pain syndrome with exertional compartment syndrome status post fasciotomy, bilateral plantar fasciitis, tinnitus, bilateral temporomandibular joint (TMJ) capsulitis, left TMJ displacement, bruxism, bilateral dry eye syndrome, allergic rhinitis, right and left leg fasciotomy surgery scars, psoriasis
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
November 14, 2024
Citation
A24075001

Veterans Law Judge

Cory M. Picton

Decisions by this judge: 907 · Granted: 35% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A24075001.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.