The Board has decided to remand the case due to an inadequate examination for addressing the symptoms and frequency of hoarseness caused by residuals of peritonsillar abscess.
The deciding factor: The VA examination did not address the criteria for Diagnostic Code 6516, including whether the residuals caused hoarseness and the frequency of the hoarseness.
- Claimed conditions
- residuals of peritonsillar abscess, canker sores, oral ulcers, infections
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- November 18, 2024
- Citation
- A24075605
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,963 · Granted: 32% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A24075605.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's lung cancer, heart issues, leg problems and back issues are now service-connected. His hearing loss disability rating has been increased to 100% effective March 4, 2011.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for chronic multi-joint degenerative disability, including infections and autoimmune disabilities, claimed as a body joint condition. The evidence did not support a finding that these conditions were related to his military service.
- Partly granted
The Veteran's claims for prostate gland injuries, infections, hypertrophy, post-operative residuals, hypertension, bilateral hearing loss, tinnitus, and major depressive disorder were previously denied. New evidence has reopened these claims but the service connection is granted only for some of them (acquired psychiatric disorders). The remaining claims remain pending.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's appeal is remanded due to the complexity of the case and the need for an expert medical opinion regarding whether VA negligence caused his disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.