The Veteran's claim for service connection for scars of the abdomen was granted on August 8, 2003, which is considered the earliest possible effective date under VA regulations. The appeal to have an earlier effective date denied.
The deciding factor: VA regulations preclude assignment of an effective date any earlier than the day following separation from service, and in this case, that date was August 8, 2003.
- Claimed conditions
- scars of the abdomen
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- November 19, 2024
- Citation
- A24076310
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation A24076310.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's appeal for increased ratings on her service-connected scars of the abdomen, bursitis, lumbar spine disability, and cervical spine disability is remanded due to new evidence. An earlier effective date of August 26, 2009, for the 20 percent rating assigned for abdominal scars is granted.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's service-connected PTSD and other disabilities render him unable to secure or maintain substantially gainful employment, warranting a TDIU rating.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities, including amputation of the right forearm and multiple scars, have rendered him in need of regular aid and attendance due to his physical limitations. The Board has determined that he meets the criteria for SMC based on the need for regular aid and attendance.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.