The Board has denied the Veteran's claims for initial compensable and higher evaluations for peripheral arterial disease of both lower extremities, finding that the evidence does not meet the criteria for a higher evaluation based on objective testing.
The deciding factor: The VA examiner determined that ABI testing was sufficient to assess the severity of the Veteran's peripheral arterial disease, but the criteria for higher evaluations were not met.
- Claimed conditions
- Peripheral Arterial Disease of the Right Lower Extremity, Peripheral Arterial Disease of the Left Lower Extremity
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- November 27, 2024
- Citation
- A24078557
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A24078557.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has found that another remand is necessary to ensure compliance with previous remand instructions regarding the Veteran's current lower extremity diagnoses.
- Granted
The Board has granted service connection for peripheral arterial disease of the bilateral lower extremities, finding that it is proximately due or aggravated by his service-connected ischemic heart disease. The issue of TDIU was also remanded.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the issues of whether service connection for peripheral arterial disease should be severed from the Veteran's record due to lack of a clear and unmistakable error in initial grant of service connection.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.