The Veteran's bladder disability, characterized by voiding dysfunction, was initially rated noncompensable in the August 2013 rating decision and later increased to 20 percent effective July 31, 2019. The claim for an earlier effective date than July 31, 2019 is denied.,The Veteran's request for a higher rating of 60 percent for the bladder disability as a manifestation of his service-connected low back disability is also denied.
The deciding factor: The evidence does not support an earlier effective date than July 31, 2019 for the assignment of a noncompensable rating due to lack of new and material evidence within one year of the August 2013 rating decision. The Veteran's bladder disability did not meet the criteria for a compensable rating prior to July 31, 2019.
- Claimed conditions
- Bladder Disability
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- December 5, 2024
- Citation
- A24080748
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A24080748.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's erectile dysfunction is not productive of deformity of the penis, and therefore a compensable rating for this condition is denied.,The Veteran's bladder disability claim is remanded due to insufficient medical opinions regarding causation and aggravation.
- Granted
The Veteran's PTSD has been granted an initial rating of 70 percent, but no higher. The bladder disability issue is remanded for further review.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's service connection claim for Multiple Sclerosis is remanded due to the need for a VA examination to determine if his disability developed during service or within the presumptive period.,The Veteran's increased rating claims for Degenerative Changes at L4-5 and L5-S1 (back disability), Right Lower Extremity Sciatic Nerve Radiculopathy, and Left Lower Extremity Sciatic Nerve Radiculopathy are remanded due to the need for a VA examination to assess the impact of flare-ups on his functional ability.,The Veteran's service connection claim for Bladder Disability is remanded due to the need for a VA examination to determine if it is proximately due to or the result of his service connected back disability, and whether it was aggravated by his service-connected back disability. ,The Veteran's service connection claim for Bowel Disability is remanded due to the need for a VA examination to determine if it is proximately due to or the result of his service connected back disability, and whether it was aggravated by his service-connected back disability.
- Denied
The Board denied separate ratings for bladder and bowel disabilities associated with service-connected lumbar strain, finding the evidence against such claims.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.