The Veteran's claims for increased evaluations for mild neuropathy of toes, left and right foot are denied.,The Veteran's claim for an evaluation in excess of 10 percent for chronic allergic conjunctivitis is also denied.
The deciding factor: The evidence does not meet the criteria for a higher rating under the applicable diagnostic codes.
- Claimed conditions
- mild neuropathy of toes, left foot, mild neuropathy of toes, right foot, chronic allergic conjunctivitis
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- December 6, 2024
- Citation
- A24081399
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation A24081399.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's claims for an earlier effective date and a higher initial disability rating for chronic allergic conjunctivitis were denied. The Board found that the Veteran was already in receipt of the maximum available evaluation, and thus no increase in rating is warranted.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Board has granted service connection for vertigo, chronic allergic conjunctivitis, and recurrent acute maxillary and ethmoidal sinusitis with underlying chronic allergic rhinitis. The decision is based on direct service connection due to in-service onset of these conditions.
- Whole decision: Dismissed
The Veteran's appeal for SMC on account of being housebound was dismissed. The Board granted SMC based on the need for regular aid and attendance of another person, finding that he requires assistance with various daily activities due to his service-connected disabilities.
- Whole decision: Partly granted
The Board granted service connection for sleep apnea as secondary to the Veteran's service-connected idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis with asthma and assigned a 10 percent rating for chronic allergic conjunctivitis, while denying service connection for abnormal weight loss.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.