The Board denied compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for a left eye disability, including optic atrophy, intraocular lens, and torsional nystagmus, finding that the additional disability was not caused by carelessness, negligence, lack of proper skill, or similar incidence of fault on the part of VA personnel.
The deciding factor: The Board found that the left eye disability was not caused by carelessness, negligence, lack of proper skill, or similar incidence of fault on the part of VA personnel.
- Claimed conditions
- left eye optic atrophy, bilateral intraocular lens, torsional nystagmus
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- December 13, 2024
- Citation
- A24083465
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A24083465.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's bilateral hearing loss and back disabilities were granted service connection. The right eye hyperopia/presbyopia was not found to be a disability for VA compensation purposes, while the left eye optic atrophy is unrelated to his active duty service.
- Denied
The Board has determined that new and material evidence was not received to reopen the Veteran's claim for service connection for left eye optic atrophy. The original denial of this claim in April 2011 found that the condition existed prior to service and worsened due to a fall, thus precluding service connection.
- Denied
The Board found that the veteran's service-connected left eye pterygium does not warrant a compensable evaluation as it only manifests dry eye with no evidence of loss of vision.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.