Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)PACT Act

The Veteran's claims for service connection for FSAD, IBS, and GERD are remanded due to inadequate VA examinations and opinions.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for left lower extremity radiculopathy is remanded due to inadequate VA examination and opinion.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for right upper extremity radiculopathy is remanded due to inadequate VA examination and opinion.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for left upper extremity radiculopathy is remanded due to insufficient competent medical evidence on file for the VA to make a decision.,No summary provided for right upper extremity radiculopathy as it was not addressed in the original decision.

The deciding factor: The Board found that the May 2022 VA examinations and opinions were inadequate, particularly due to failure to address relevant evidence of record regarding diagnoses and treatment.,The Board found that the May 2022 VA examination was inadequate as it did not diagnose left lower extremity radiculopathy or provide a rationale for its negative nexus opinion.,The Board found that the May 2022 VA examination was inadequate due to failure to address relevant evidence of record regarding diagnoses and treatment, particularly the November 2021 letter from a private physician.,The Board found insufficient competent medical evidence on file for the VA to make a decision on the claim for left upper extremity radiculopathy as there is no nexus opinion provided in the original decision.,No reasoning provided for right upper extremity radiculopathy as it was not addressed in the original decision.

Claimed conditions
Female Sexual Arousal Disorder (FSAD), Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS), Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD), Left Lower Extremity Radiculopathy, Right Upper Extremity Radiculopathy, Left Upper Extremity Radiculopathy
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
December 16, 2024
Citation
A24083755

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A24083755.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.