The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient medical opinions regarding the relationship between the Veteran's jaw condition and his service, specifically the extraction of wisdom teeth.
The deciding factor: The VA contract examiners did not provide adequate etiology opinions for the Veteran's claimed jaw condition related to service.
- Claimed conditions
- jaw condition, residuals of wisdom teeth extraction
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- December 18, 2024
- Citation
- A24084450
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A24084450.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Dismissed
The Veteran's appeals for service connection on the issues of chest pain, ear condition, vaginosis, syncope, thyroid condition, and jaw condition have been dismissed due to non-jurisdictional procedural defects. The Board has also remanded the claims for service connection on the issues of occipital neuralgia, chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) for further development.
- Denied
The Veteran's claim for higher ratings for bilateral hearing loss and service connection for back, skin, and jaw conditions were denied. The Board found the evidence insufficient to support a finding of service connection or entitlement to increased ratings.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for service connection for a left arm and shoulder condition, as well as a jaw condition, are being remanded due to procedural errors. The Board will consider the evidence of record at the time of the April 2024 agency of original jurisdiction (AOJ) decision.
- Denied
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities do not meet the criteria for special monthly compensation (SMC) based on housebound status as he does not have a single disability rated at 100% and additional disabilities independently ratable at 60%, nor is he permanently housebound by reason of his service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.