Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Dismissed

The Veteran's requests to readjudicate service connection for hand arthritis and erectile dysfunction were dismissed because the claims were not timely filed or supported by new and relevant evidence.

The deciding factor: The claims were not timely filed, as the Veteran did not submit a timely Notice of Disagreement (NOD) within one year of notification of the June 2017 rating decision. Additionally, no new and relevant evidence was received to reopen the claims.

Claimed conditions
hand arthritis, erectile dysfunction
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
December 18, 2024
Citation
A24084592

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A24084592.

What this means for you

A dismissal means the Board did not decide the issue on its merits — usually because it was withdrawn or had become moot. It says more about procedure than about whether a claim like this can win.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.