Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for further development regarding potential exposure to PFAS firefighting foam and for a VA examination to determine the nature and etiology of his shoulder conditions.

The deciding factor: The RO must reconsider whether the Veteran's TERAs include exposure to carcinogenic firefighting foam, as this was not considered in the previous decision. Additionally, a new VA examination is needed to address the relationship between the Veteran's claimed shoulder disabilities and his military service.

Claimed conditions
Degenerative arthritis, degenerative disc disease, spinal stenosis status post lumbar surgery, Arteriosclerotic heart disease, heart block, and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stents (claimed as ischemic heart disease), Hydronephrosis and kidney stones, Sleep apnea, Bladder cancer with bladder stone (claimed as residuals of bladder cancer), Benign prostatic hyperplasia with erectile dysfunction (claimed as prostate condition post-surgery), Gastroesophageal reflux disease (claimed as severe reflux), Hypertension (high blood pressure), Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) with ulcerative colitis and diverticulosis (claimed as ulcerated colitis with IBS and erythematous mucosa), Basal cell under right eye, Rotator cuff, shoulder impingement and bicipital tendonitis, right (claimed as tear in both rotator cuffs), Rotator cuff, shoulder impingement and bicipital tendonitis, left (claimed as tear in both rotator cuffs), Squamous cell cancer left arm
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
December 19, 2024
Citation
A24085317

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A24085317.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.