Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's claim for special monthly compensation (SMC) based on the need for regular aid and attendance or housebound status is being remanded due to a pre-decisional duty to assist error. The Board finds that medical clarification is required regarding whether the Veteran needs regular aid and attendance due to his service-connected disabilities.

The deciding factor: The decision was remanded because of an error in obtaining necessary medical clarification regarding the Veteran's need for regular aid and attendance due to his service-connected disabilities.

Claimed conditions
depressive disorder, mild, with anxious distress with alcohol use disorder, lumbar spine degenerative arthritis with L5-S1 disc bulge, tension headaches, left elbow lateral epicondylitis, left shoulder rotator cuff tendonitis, flexion limitation, left hip femoral acetabular impingement syndrome and left hip gluteus medius tendon strain, right knee patellofemoral pain syndrome, right foot Morton's neuroma with right foot first metatarsophalangeal joint sprain, tinnitus, pityriasis rosea, tenosynovitis-right elbow lateral epicondylitis, right wrist sprain, left knee patellofemoral pain syndrome, gastroesophageal reflux disease, right lower extremity radiculopathy, left lower extremity radiculopathy, tenosynovitis-left elbow lateral epicondylitis, pronation impairment-right elbow lateral epicondylitis, right hip femoral acetabular impingement syndrome, limitation of flexion, impairment of the thigh-left hip femoral acetabular impingement syndrome and left hip gluteus medius tendon strain, erectile dysfunction, right hip femoral acetabular impingement syndrome, limitation of extension, extension limitation-left hip femoral acetabular impingement syndrome and left hip gluteus medius tendon strain, traumatic brain injury
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
December 26, 2024
Citation
A24085948

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A24085948.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.