The Veteran's urinary stress incontinence is found to have started during service and has continued since then, with the Board granting service connection for this condition.
The deciding factor: The Board found that the Veteran's urinary stress incontinence had its onset in service following a military sexual trauma (MST) assault and has continued since service. The decision was made based on the Veteran's credible lay statements regarding her symptoms, as well as STRs showing complaints of urinary issues prior to and after the MST.
- Claimed conditions
- Urinary Stress Incontinence
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- December 30, 2024
- Citation
- A24086602
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation A24086602.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board allowed the benefit or issue identified in this decision. Review the original order: other issues in the same appeal may have a different outcome, and this decision does not predict another claim.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's urinary stress incontinence status post urethral surgery prior to November 4, 2024, is rated at 20 percent.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for service connection of urinary stress incontinence was denied as the evidence did not show that his bladder condition arose prior to April 4, 2020.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's claim for urinary stress incontinence is granted as the condition started during service and continues today.,The Veteran's claim for GERD is denied as there is no evidence that it is related to her service-connected cholecystectomy.,The Veteran's claim for left lower extremity radiculopathy is denied as she does not have a current diagnosis of this condition.,The Veteran's claim for an increased disability rating for tonsillectomy remains pending and will be remanded.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's initial increased disability rating for urinary stress incontinence prior to October 30, 2009 was denied. However, a 40 percent disability rating was granted for the period from October 30, 2009.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.