Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's appeal for an increase in the disability evaluation for residuals of left wrist ganglion cyst is denied.,An initial disability evaluation of 50 percent for migraine headaches is granted, and a higher evaluation of 50 percent is also granted. The appeal for an increased evaluation for migraine headaches is granted.,The Veteran's appeal for an increase in the disability evaluation for migraine headaches remains denied.,The Veteran's appeal for an increase in the disability evaluation for left forearm scarring status post stab wound is denied, and a compensable evaluation for superficial linear scars of the left forearm is also denied.,The Veteran's appeal for TDIU is remanded to determine if he qualifies for extraschedular TDIU based on his service-connected disabilities.

The deciding factor: There is no evidence showing ankylosis or its functional equivalent in the Veteran's left wrist, which prevents a higher evaluation.,The Veteran's migraine headaches have been productive of very frequent characteristic prostrating attacks throughout the appeal period, meeting the criteria for a 50 percent evaluation.,The Veteran's disability picture has not worsened to warrant an increase beyond the current 30 percent initial evaluation.,The Veteran's scarring does not meet the criteria for a compensable evaluation under DC 7802 or 7804, as none of his scars are painful or unstable and their total area is less than 144 square inches.,The matter must be referred to the Director of Compensation Services for an advisory opinion on whether the Veteran qualifies for TDIU based on his service-connected disabilities.

Claimed conditions
left wrist ganglion cyst, migraine headaches, left forearm scarring status post stab wound
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
December 31, 2024
Citation
A24086794

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A24086794.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.