Remanded (sent back)
The Board remanded the claim for service connection of erectile dysfunction due to exposure to ionizing radiation. The Veteran's case will be reviewed again with new medical opinions.
The deciding factor: The Board found that previous VA opinions were based on inaccurate factual premises and required new, more detailed opinions.
- Claimed conditions
- erectile dysfunction
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- Ionizing radiation
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- January 14, 2025
- Citation
- 25000470
Want to see how appeals like this one tend to go? Appeals like mine
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.