Partly granted
The appeal was denied for compensation under the provision of 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for recurrent lymphadenopathy, and remanded for further development on other service connection claims.
The deciding factor: The Board found that there was no evidence of a current disability related to VA treatment or an event not reasonably foreseeable during active service.
- Claimed conditions
- Recurrent lymphadenopathy, Recurrent headache disability, Recurrent bilateral eye disability (meibomian gland dysfunction, racial melanosis), Recurrent right foot disability (Morton's disease, plantar fasciitis, other than pes planus), Recurrent left foot disability (Morton's disease, plantar fasciitis, other than pes planus), Recurrent urinary disability (urinary tract infections)
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- February 12, 2025
- Citation
- 25002158
Want to see how appeals like this one tend to go? Appeals like mine
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.