Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Board remands the case to secure a VA medical opinion that addresses whether the Veteran's sleep apnea is secondary to his service-connected disabilities, including degenerative disc disease and intervertebral disc syndrome of the lumbar spine, status post laminotomy and partial diskectomy; left shoulder, status post total shoulder arthroplasty; right shoulder tendonitis; radiculopathy of the left lower extremity; right lower extremity radiculopathy; left foot first and second toe numbness, status post benign peripheral nerve sheath tumor removal; and/or bipolar disorder with mixed features and ADHD in near total remission.

The deciding factor: The Board finds that the evidence suggests that the Veteran's obstructive sleep apnea may be associated with his psychiatric disability, to include medication used to treat the disability; and the examiner's rationale also raises the theory that the Veteran's obesity was an intermediate step between his obstructive sleep apnea and the service-connected musculoskeletal, peripheral nerve, and psychiatric disabilities identified above.

Claimed conditions
sleep apnea, bipolar disorder with mixed features, ADHD in near total remission, degenerative disc disease and intervertebral disc syndrome of the lumbar spine, status post laminotomy and partial diskectomy, left shoulder, status post total shoulder arthroplasty, right shoulder tendonitis, radiculopathy of the left lower extremity, right lower extremity radiculopathy, left foot first and second toe numbness, status post benign peripheral nerve sheath tumor removal
How they argued it
Secondary to another service-connected condition
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
February 18, 2025
Citation
25002287

Veterans Law Judge

GAYLE STROMMEN

Decisions by this judge: 2,092 · Granted: 42% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 25002287.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.