The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for a bladder disability, finding that it pre-existed her active service and was not aggravated beyond its natural progression. The gynecological disability issue is remanded for further development.

The deciding factor: The evidence of record shows clear and unmistakable evidence that the Veteran's bladder disability existed prior to service and was not aggravated by military service, while the gynecological disability issue requires additional development before a decision can be made.

Claimed conditions

bladder disability (painful bladder syndrome), gynecological disability (irregular menstrual cycle with pain, endometriosis, and a partial hysterectomy)

How they argued it

Presumptive (no nexus needed)

Exposure basis

None

Rating assigned

None in this decision

Decision date

February 19, 2025

Citation

25002408

Want to see how appeals like this one tend to go? Appeals like mine