Remanded (sent back)
The appeal was remanded for further development, including a medical opinion on the etiology of the Veteran's claimed sexual dysfunction related to his service-connected lung adenocarcinoma.
The deciding factor: Remand is necessary due to the need for a medical opinion regarding the etiology of the Veteran's reported sexual dysfunction in relation to his service-connected lung adenocarcinoma.
- Claimed conditions
- lung adenocarcinoma
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- February 19, 2025
- Citation
- 25002419
Want to see how appeals like this one tend to go? Appeals like mine
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.