Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claim for a new VA examination to ensure compliance with the Court's instructions regarding the adequacy of previous examinations and opinions.
The deciding factor: The prior VA opinion was deemed inadequate by the Court due to its failure to properly consider lay evidence and the examiner's improper reliance on the absence of contemporaneous medical evidence in the service treatment records.
- Claimed conditions
- neurological disorder of any extremity
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- Agent Orange / herbicides
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- February 25, 2025
- Citation
- 25002766
Want to see how appeals like this one tend to go? Appeals like mine
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.