Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claim for a new VA opinion to address in-service notations and lay contentions regarding symptom chronicity and continuity.
The deciding factor: The previous VA opinion failed to consider in-service notations as instructed by the Board, and did not provide sufficient rationale.
- Claimed conditions
- skin disability, to include acne rosacea and chloracne
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- March 31, 2025
- Citation
- 25004304
Want to see how appeals like this one tend to go? Appeals like mine
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.