The Board denied higher ratings for the Veteran's left abducens palsy and cranial nerve V conditions, as well as a TDIU from December 6, 2012 to September 7, 2014.
The deciding factor: The weight of the evidence did not support findings that would warrant higher ratings or a TDIU during the specified periods.
- Claimed conditions
- left abducens palsy, abducens palsy of cranial nerve V
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- April 23, 2025
- Citation
- 25005535
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,757 · Granted: 23% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 25005535.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for additional development, including a new VA examination to assess his service-connected left abducens palsy and related conditions. The TDIU claim is also being remanded due to inextricably intertwined issues.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for a disability rating in excess of 10 percent for left abducens palsy, entitlement to a TDIU from December 6, 2012, to September 7, 2014, and an initial disability rating in excess of 10 percent for abducens palsy of the cranial nerve V due to incomplete development. The Veteran's claims are remanded for additional examinations and development.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim for a higher disability rating for left abducens palsy is being remanded due to the need for additional VA optometry records.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim for a higher rating for his service-connected left abducens palsy is being remanded due to the need for additional development, including obtaining updated VA treatment records and scheduling an eye examination.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.