The Board remands the matter for an addendum medical opinion to address the nature and etiology of any prostate disorder, including BPH.
The deciding factor: The November 2023 medical examiner's opinion was inadequate as it failed to consider lay statements and relied on the absence of contemporaneous records.
- Claimed conditions
- prostate disorder, to include benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- April 23, 2025
- Citation
- 25005546
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the service connection claims for various conditions due to a lack of compliance with previous remand directives and inadequate medical opinions.
- Partly granted
The Board grants service connection for headaches as the evidence supports a direct link to the Veteran's active military service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claims for service connection for hypertension and a prostate disorder due to pre-decisional duty to assist errors.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for a prostate disorder, finding that the evidence does not support a link between the condition and the Veteran's military service.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.