The Board remands the claim for a new addendum opinion to clarify and provide an adequate opinion on the residuals of the right parotidectomy.
The deciding factor: The examiner's previous opinion was insufficient as it only addressed numbness and scarring, while other conditions were also noted.
- Claimed conditions
- residuals of right parotidectomy
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- May 6, 2025
- Citation
- 25006136
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.