The Board remands the case for an addendum opinion addressing whether the Veteran's chronic scalp folliculitis is related to his in-service exposure to herbicide agents.
The deciding factor: The previous VA opinions were found inadequate due to lack of a clear explanation linking statements to the ultimate opinion and failure to consider lay statements and medical literature relevant to the case.
- Claimed conditions
- chronic scalp folliculitis
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- Burn pits / airborne hazards
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- May 15, 2025
- Citation
- 25006610
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The appeal for service connection of chronic scalp folliculitis due to herbicide exposure or secondary to diabetes is remanded. The Board needs a clearer medical opinion on the cause.
- Granted
The Board granted service connection for obstructive sleep apnea, effective from the date of the February 2025 rating decision.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claim for a medical examination to determine if the Veteran's current neck strain is related to his in-service activities.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claim for a rating in excess of 70 percent for PTSD due to an inadequate medical opinion.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.