The Board denied the Veteran's claims for revision of prior rating decisions based on clear and unmistakable error (CUE), as there was no evidence that the outcome would have been manifestly different had the errors not occurred.

The deciding factor: The Board found that the RO's actions in assigning noncompensable evaluations or failing to grant service connection were proper interpretations of the evidence at the time, and that reasonable minds could differ on the outcome based on the record and applicable law.

Claimed conditions

migraine headaches, radial nerve paresthesia (right upper extremity), radial nerve paresthesia (left upper extremity), neurological disorder (right lower extremity), neurological disorder (left lower extremity)

How they argued it

Direct service connection

Exposure basis

None

Rating assigned

None in this decision

Decision date

February 5, 2025

Citation

A25010273

Want to see how appeals like this one tend to go? Appeals like mine