The Board remands the claim for further evidentiary development to confirm the Veteran's status under the Blue Water Navy Act and ensure compliance with the duty to assist.
The deciding factor: The decision is based on a pre-decisional duty-to-assist error related to the lack of signed documentation confirming the Veteran's eligibility under the Blue Water Navy Act.
- Claimed conditions
- monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- Agent Orange / herbicides
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- February 5, 2025
- Citation
- A25010370
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 734 · Granted: 31% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A25010370.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, finding that the evidence does not support a link to in-service exposure or injury.
- Partly granted
The veteran's claim for a higher rating for monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) was denied. The claim for service connection for sarcoidosis was remanded for further evaluation.
- Granted
The Veteran's service connection for monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance is granted due to exposure to herbicide agents during his service in the Republic of Vietnam, as provided by the PACT Act.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's diabetes mellitus is rated at 20 percent. The Board finds a 40 percent rating is warranted for his diabetes mellitus as he requires insulin, restricted diet, and regulation of activities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.