Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Board remands the case to obtain a retrospective medical opinion on the extent that the Veteran's service-connected disabilities affect his ability to secure and maintain substantially gainful employment.

The deciding factor: The decision is based on the need for a more detailed assessment of how the Veteran's service-connected conditions impact his employability, given the unavailable service treatment records and the Court's previous remand instructions.

Claimed conditions
adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood, associated with angiokeratoma of the scrotum, lumbosacral strain with degenerative arthritis, IVDS, spinal stenosis, fusion, spondylolisthesis, vertebral fracture, segmental instability, sacroiliac weakness, radiculopathy, right lower extremity (sciatic nerve) associated with lumbosacral strain with degenerative arthritis, IVDS, spinal stenosis, fusion, spondylolisthesis, vertebral fracture, segmental instability, sacroiliac weakness, radiculopathy, left lower extremity (sciatic nerve) associated with lumbosacral strain with degenerative arthritis, IVDS, spinal stenosis, fusion, spondylolisthesis, vertebral fracture, sacroiliac weakness, radiculopathy, right lower extremity (femoral nerve) associated with lumbosacral strain with degenerative arthritis, IVDS, spinal stenosis, fusion, spondylolisthesis, vertebral fracture, segmental instability, sacroiliac weakness, radiculopathy, left lower extremity (femoral nerve) associated with lumbosacral strain with degenerative arthritis, IVDS, spinal stenosis, fusion, spondylolisthesis, vertebral fracture, segmental instability, sacroiliac weakness, angiokeratoma of the scrotum, scar, residuals, right inguinal hernia repair
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
February 7, 2025
Citation
A25011726

Veterans Law Judge

G. William Riggs

Decisions by this judge: 575 · Granted: 29% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A25011726.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.