Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claims for an eye condition and prostate cancer as secondary to radiation exposure due to inadequate medical opinions and non-compliance with previous remand directives.
The deciding factor: Inadequate medical opinions were provided, and there was non-compliance with previous remand directives regarding the Veteran's claimed exposure to ionizing radiation during service in 1955.
- Claimed conditions
- eye condition, prostate cancer
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- November 5, 2025
- Citation
- 25013699
Want to see how appeals like this one tend to go? Appeals like mine
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.