The Board denied an evaluation in excess of 10 percent for the anterior neck scar and denied an effective date earlier than April 2, 2015, for the grant of service connection.
The deciding factor: The evidence did not show that the Veteran's anterior neck scar involved more than one characteristic of disfigurement or that there was an earlier effective date warranted based on a notice of intent to file form received in 2015.
- Claimed conditions
- anterior neck scar
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- February 25, 2025
- Citation
- A25016681
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 896 · Granted: 51% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A25016681.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Veteran's claims for increased ratings and service connection were denied. The initial rating of 10 percent for migraines was granted, but the anterior neck scar and vertigo claims remain at their current non-compensable ratings.
- Partly granted
The Board granted readjudication of the claims for restoration of service connection and the claim for service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder, as new and relevant evidence was received.
- Denied
The Board has determined that the grant of service connection for various conditions was clearly and unmistakably erroneous due to a lack of qualifying active duty, resulting in denial of the appeal.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's service-connected anterior neck scar needs to be re-evaluated due to a duty-to-assist error in the previous rating decision. The AOJ must obtain color photographs of her scar and schedule an examination for a full evaluation.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.