Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for revision of the October 17, 2007 rating decision on the basis of clear and unmistakable error (CUE).
The deciding factor: The AOJ did not commit an error of law because it was VA's interpretation of the law to require objective evidence of painful motion when applying 38 C.F.R. § 4.59 at the time of the October 2007 rating decision.
- Claimed conditions
- right knee patellofemoral pain syndrome, left knee patellofemoral pain syndrome with patellar tendonitis
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- March 10, 2025
- Citation
- A25021712
Want to see how appeals like this one tend to go? Appeals like mine
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.