The Board denied the Veteran's appeal for an earlier effective date for service connection of coronary artery disease with angina, as there was no evidence of a formal claim or new and relevant evidence received prior to April 28, 2023.
The deciding factor: The decision was based on the lack of evidence of a formal claim or new and relevant evidence received before April 28, 2023, which is the date the Veteran's supplemental claim for service connection was accepted by VA.
- Claimed conditions
- coronary artery disease with angina
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- March 13, 2025
- Citation
- A25023507
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 696 · Granted: 63% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A25023507.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's service connection claims for further development due to alleged herbicide exposure in Thailand. The Veteran is seeking service connection for various conditions, including diabetes and peripheral neuropathy, all claimed as secondary to herbicide agent exposure.
- Granted
The Veteran's diabetes mellitus, cataracts, peripheral neuropathy of bilateral upper and lower extremities, kidney disease, erectile dysfunction, and coronary artery disease with angina are presumed to be related to his military service due to herbicide exposure.
- Granted
The Veteran's claim for service connection for status-post excision of melanoma of middle-to-lower back was not reopened due to lack of new and material evidence. However, his claim for service connection for coronary artery disease with angina is granted based on presumed exposure to Agent Orange during active service.
- Granted
The Board has granted service connection for arteriosclerotic heart disease with angina, but denied service connection for a bilateral shoulder disorder.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.