The Veteran's post-concussion syndrome was granted an evaluation of 40 percent, and special monthly compensation based on aid and attendance was also granted.
The deciding factor: The evidence did not support a higher rating for the post-concussion syndrome as it did not meet the criteria for a level of impairment greater than '1' in any facet under DC 8045.
- Claimed conditions
- Post-concussion syndrome
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 40%
- Decision date
- March 25, 2025
- Citation
- A25027766
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 857 · Granted: 35% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A25027766.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Veteran's claim for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) is denied as there is no document in the claims file that could be construed as a formal or informal claim for TDIU prior to December 2, 2013. The effective date of the award cannot be earlier than this date.
- Denied
The Veteran's appeal was denied because the November 24, 2023 decision granting service connection for posttraumatic headaches and post-concussion syndrome was not timely appealed. The Veteran did not file a timely Board Appeal request within one year of receiving the decision.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim for an increased evaluation in excess of 10 percent for her service-connected post-concussion syndrome is being remanded due to a duty to assist error. The Board will consider the same record as the RO, but any evidence not considered by the AOJ will be considered during the adjudication of this claim.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's increased rating claim for post-concussion syndrome is denied, and his cervical spine condition service connection claim is remanded.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.