The Board granted earlier effective dates for service connection of idiopathic peripheral neuropathy in the bilateral feet and upper extremities, based on new and material evidence received within one year of a prior denial.
The deciding factor: The RO did not consider new and material evidence received in March and April 2010, which rendered the January 2010 rating decision non-final. The October 2009 informal claim remained open until the February 2023 rating decision granted service connection.
- Claimed conditions
- idiopathic peripheral neuropathy of the left foot, idiopathic peripheral neuropathy of the right foot, left upper extremity polyneuropathy, right upper extremity polyneuropathy
- How they argued it
- Reopened with new and material evidence
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- April 1, 2025
- Citation
- A25029699
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Partly granted
The Board denied service connection for loss of bowel and bladder function but granted a 60% rating for right and left lower extremity sciatic peripheral neuropathy, and a 50% rating for right upper extremity polyneuropathy, effective from March 18, 2023.
- Partly granted
The Board granted a 40 percent rating for right upper extremity polyneuropathy, a 30 percent rating for left upper extremity polyneuropathy, and a 40 percent rating for both right lower extremity and left lower extremity polyneuropathy. Special monthly compensation was denied.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claim for service connection for sarcoidosis as new and relevant evidence has been received since the previous denial.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claim for service connection for tinnitus to correct a duty to assist error, as the Veteran's lay statements regarding onset and continuity of symptoms were not adequately considered in the previous decision.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.