Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)PACT Act

The Board remanded the Veteran's appeal of the effective date for service connection awards for prostate cancer and residuals, as well as initial disability ratings, to allow further development regarding potential presumptive exposure to herbicide agents via service aboard U.S.S. Southerland in Vietnamese territorial waters and to obtain a medical opinion regarding direct causation if presumptive exposure cannot be established. The case was complicated by service connection being granted under the PACT Act effective August 10, 2022, while the Veteran's claim was filed in December 2020.

The deciding factor: The Board found remand warranted to correct pre-decisional duty to assist errors by verifying the Veteran's potential in-service exposure to herbicide agents (specifically whether U.S.S. Southerland sailed within 12 nautical miles of the Republic of Vietnam in September-October 1972 when deck logs were unavailable) and to obtain a medical examination and opinion regarding direct causation of prostate cancer and residuals from alleged exposure to AFFF and PKP, as required by 38 U.S.C. § 1168(a) when a veteran has evidence of disability and participation in a toxic exposure risk activity.

Claimed conditions
prostate cancer, erectile dysfunction, prostate cancer scar
How they argued it
Presumptive (no nexus needed)
Exposure basis
Agent Orange / herbicides
Rating assigned
20%
Decision date
April 1, 2025
Citation
A25029864

Veterans Law Judge

DONNIE R. HACHEY

Decisions by this judge: 2,249 · Granted: 37% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A25029864.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.