The Board dismissed the Veteran's claims for service connection and increased ratings due to improper concurrent election of multiple review options.
The deciding factor: The Veteran made an improper concurrent election of multiple review options, which is prohibited under the Appeals Modernization Act (AMA).
- Claimed conditions
- hypogonadism, major depressive disorder (claimed as insomnia), right shoulder strain, unspecified anxiety disorder (claimed as insomnia), low testosterone, allergic rhinitis (previously rated with sinusitis and claimed as rhinorrhea), cervical degenerative disc disease (previously evaluated as cervical spondylosis), hypertension, which is currently 10 percent disabling, intervertebral disc syndrome with transitional lumbosacral vertebrae with mid and lower lumbar spondylosis with lumbosacral strain (claimed as thoracic spine pain, lumbar DDD, strain and formerly evaluated under DC5292 and DC 5242), bilateral eye lattice degeneration of the peripheral retina, left shoulder strain, left upper extremity radiculopathy, ulnar nerve (claimed as cervical radicopathy), osteoarthritis, left hip with trochanteric pain syndrome (limitation of extension) (claimed also as increase for left hip, osteoarthritis and bursitis), osteoarthritis of the left hip with trochanteric pain syndrome (limitation of flexion) (claimed also as increase for left hip, osteoarthritis and bursitis), left hip trochanteric pain syndrome (limitation of rotation) (previously rated as left hip arthritis and claimed also as increase for left hip, osteoarthritis and bursitis), sciatic nerve involvement, right lower extremity, residual, scar, left shoulder open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) surgery incision, right upper extremity radiculopathy, ulnar nerve (claimed as cervical radicopathy), chronic sinusitis (previously rated with allergic rhinitis and claimed as rhinorrhea), tinea pedis
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- April 18, 2025
- Citation
- A25035937
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 696 · Granted: 63% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A25035937.
What this means for you
A dismissal means the Board did not decide the issue on its merits — usually because it was withdrawn or had become moot. It says more about procedure than about whether a claim like this can win.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board has denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for right shoulder strain as there is no evidence of a chronic condition in service or within one year after discharge, and the medical opinion found that his current condition is not related to his military service.
- Partly granted
The Veteran's hypertension, left shoulder strain, and right shoulder disability are all granted as service-connected.,The Veteran is also remanded for a rating in excess of 10 percent for degenerative arthritis of the spine and for service connection for sleep apnea.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient evidence regarding the nature and etiology of the Veteran's diagnosed bilateral tinea pedis, which is a condition related to service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to insufficient medical opinions and a need for additional examination.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.